"CIA To Air Decades Of Its Dirty Laundry" - WP

The Washington Post of June 22, 2007 reports a
historical event in US history. Director Hayden has
announced that he is declassifying and releasing hundreds
of documents of CIA gross violations and abuses of
individual civil liberties tantamount to felonious
criminal acts.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content
/article/2007/06/21/
AR2007062102434.html?nav=rss_email/components

Journalists Karen De Young and Walter De Pinkus
authored this remarkable article.

Civilian Intelligence will focus this first
responsive blog on one issue that is included
in the revelations:

Non-consensual experimentation on US citizens

The Washington Post article references "unwitting" citizens
directly identifies only drug testing.

The facts are that the US government, including the
CIA, regularly conduct extensive cruel and inhumane
weapons testing on US citizens on a regular basis.
These are known as "skunk projects."

A series of testing has been conducted on weapons
falling into the category of "Directed Energy"
weapons. These include microwave weapons, acoustic
weapons (sound), lasers (light), and other technologies
of the 21st century which have been the cornerstone
of upcoming military weapons.

Citizens selected as test subjects often fall into
demographics of "unpopular" minorities and a significant
number are those who have been whistle blowers of some
various kinds. Thus, the infliction of military weapons
technologies upon helpless civilians has reflected a
deliberate retaliative element. It can only be described
as essentially a sadistic crime against humanity.

Civilians who are selected as targets for advanced
weapons practice and testing are abandoned by all
government agencies they turn to for help, including
local law enforcement. Further, there is no medical
help for these people because the private medical
sector does not have an understanding of the problem
or any knowledge of what medical assistance to provide.
They don't even consider that the patient in their
office or emergency room could be the victim of
a US government covert weapons testing program.

To insure that the victims of such unconscionable
treatment do not receive any help or support at all,
standard discrediting tactics are employed to
invalidate and isolate the targeted defenseless
citizen.

The US government has an arsenal of nasty
weapons that only a sadistic sci fi writer
would create. They are all invasive to the
human body and mind. They have no defenses.
They destroy lives and encapsulate innocent
victims in a life of hell that cannot be
understood by anyone outside of those who
inflict this kind of misery - which is
the US government.

Senator John Glenn once authored federal
legislation to outlaw non-consensual
citizen experimentation but the bill failed.
That says that non-consensual human
experimentation is a fact but members of
Congress condone it and refuse to provide
protect from this for citizens.

These types of extreme abuses of Human
Rights has been going on without cessation
even though the Clinton Administration
hearings that revealed the horrors of
programs entitled MKULTRA.

The only question remaining at this
point in US history is "What will
Congress and the US citizenry do
about this horrifying information?"

The only rational response is to end
this once and forever, and hold those
who engaged in this criminally
accountable.

Intelligent civilians need to respond
strongly to this revelation and CIA
disclosure. This issue must be
thoroughly explored in open oath-
bound hearings. This must end.
That is the only intelligent outcome.

Non Consensual Human Experimentation in North America

The Washington Post of May 28,2007 reveals a plan
for non-consensual human experimentation planned for
20,000 critically injured or ill patients in several
cities in North America, in an article entitled
"Critical Care Without Consent."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/26

The article reads in part:

"The studies are being conducted by the
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, a network of
medical centers that do research in Seattle,
Portland, San Diego, Dallas, Birmingham,
Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, Toronto and Ottawa, and in
Iowa and British Columbia" (end of WP quote)


This means that persons found with
conditions applicable to the study found in
"the field", meaning outside of a
hospital setting, will be placed into either the
control group (given the standard treatment) or
the test group (given the new treatment.)

The reason given for the US and Canadian govern-
ments to approve this test for their citizens
and residents is that the conditions of the
patients will be too grave for them to grant
permission. In addition, families of the
critically ill are alleged unable, due to stress,
to make a decision of that magnitude
under pressure when seconds count in saving
lives.

Here are the questions the intelligent
civilian should ask:

1. Who will be making the decisions
as to which patient receives which treatment?

2. Will the patients or their legal
decision makers be informed that they are
participating in a study at the time of
treatment? If not, when.

3. Will the patients remain in the study
after the patient is stabilized, for those
who did not die, and if so, will they have
the right of informed consent at that time?

4. Can a person "opt out" of such a
field trial in advance of finding oneself
in a situation which qualifies you for it?

5. Is a participant obligated to pay the
cost of services for such a study? Or,
should they themselves be paid for being
a participant in the study. The latter
is the standard procedure for
all other medical testing studies.

6. Will the study be fully disclosed to the
public at some point in time without violating
one's privacy.

7. If the outcome of the study is poor, who
will be the legally responsible party for
civil recourse, if necessary, or is immunity
and legal shielding covering this study?

San Diego is listed as one of the cities
whose citizens and residents will be
unwillingly placed in this study. San Diego
is a large military based community which
has primarily 3 medical systems which all
civilians participate in. All have strong
databases.

San Diego is also a large DOD contractors
center. Citizens of San Diego have long
reported being used as Guinea pigs for various
directed energy weapons.

A Homeland Security deputy and an engineer
involved in military technology development
told Civilian Intelligence that the protocol
for testing weapons on civilians is called
"skunk projects" and that they take place
in San Diego and always will.

Non-consensual experimentation is NEVER
acceptable. It takes only seconds, even
in an emergency, to inquire "We are
involved in a large government
approved program for experimental
emergency care. Do you consent to
participate in it?"

As it stands, the person making the
decision of who gets the routine
care and who does not is a key element
not detailed in the press release.
There must be pure objectivity in
this element of the trial. Patients
must be informed as soon as possible.
And there must be a legally recognized
manner to "opt in" or "opt out."

Finally, the intelligent civilian
must focus on the central issue
of whether or not Americans find
it acceptable for the US government
to become our guardians and make
life altering determinations for us
such as that some of us will be
subjected to medical experimentation
without informed consent.

The US had has a history of obtaining medical
information in various unethical ways. First,
the US government imported medical doctors
and their information derived from the Nazi
regime human experimentation horrors
at the end of WWII, in Operation Paperclip.

From that point forward, the US government
has justified all non-consensual human
experimentation. They have "used"
military members, non--consensual prisoners
in custody in the US, and civilians.
Every weapon and technology in development
and production is tested on some US citizens
without their knowledge and or consent
by Defense Contractors with the expressed
approval and support of the US government.

The intelligent civilian realizes that
these are precedents being set each time
citizens are used for experiments
authorized by the government. Therefore,
this trend must be promptly addressed.